PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 13, 2025Frontiers in Digital Health0 citationsOpen Access

Assessing Patient Preferences in Shared Decision-Making: Method Comparison

Assessing patient preferences for medical decision making - a comparison of different methods

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JFJakub FusiakAWAndreas WolkensteinVHVerena S. Hoffmann

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Cross-sectional survey revealed diverse preferences for elicitation methods among patients, suggesting healthcare professionals enhance acceptance in practice.

Key Points

  • To assess patient preferences for various methods of preference assessment in shared decision-making.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional online survey
  • Included five preference elicitation methods: best-worst scaling, direct weighting, PAPRIKA, time trade-off, and standard gamble
  • Questionnaire distributed via academic and patient advocacy lists
  • PAPRIKA received the highest ratings for clarity and usability
  • Simpler methods rated less useful for nuanced preferences
  • 82% of participants could envision using at least one method in clinical settings

Cite This Study

Fusiak et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692523b2c0ce034ddc35478bhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1641765
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share