Systematic review reveals AI in insurance increases anxiety and disengagement in consumers, suggesting a need for better governance.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping insurance services, yet it introduces significant consumer risks such as privacy erosion, service exclusion, and trust deterioration. This systematic review clarifies how specific AI features—algorithmic opacity, hyper‐personalization, and data‐driven bias—trigger psychological responses and shape consumer decisions, ultimately producing negative outcomes. Drawing from 33 empirical studies, the review organizes fragmented findings using the TCCM (Theory–Context–Characteristic–Method) framework, revealing theoretical fragmentation, geographical concentration, and methodological imbalance. To move beyond static categorizations, the study proposes a novel Trigger–Psychology–Decision–Outcome (TPDO) framework that maps sequential pathways of consumer harm. Findings show that adverse consumer outcomes emerge primarily through fairness concerns, anxiety, and perceived loss of control, influencing behaviors such as disengagement and resistance to AI‐enabled insurance systems. This mechanism‐based synthesis provides theoretical clarity, outlines targeted avenues for future research, and informs consumer‐centric governance of algorithmic insurance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: