This validation study assesses psychometric properties of three orthorexia measures in late adolescent women, suggesting the TOS and DOS are reliable tools.
This study evaluated the psychometric properties of three orthorexia measures, ORTO-R, Teruel Orthorexia Scale (TOS), and Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS), in 1337 Croatian women aged 18 to 21. Participants also completed eating disorder measures (EAT-26, DEAS-S). Confirmatory factor analysis tested structural validity. The TOS (two-factor: χ²/ df = 9.40, CFI = 0.951, TLI = 0.943, RMSEA = 0.079, SRMR = 0.070) and DOS (single-factor: χ²/ df = 10.68, CFI = 0.980, TLI = 0.972, RMSEA = 0.085, SRMR = 0.037) showed good fit and strong reliability (TOS ω = 0.85/0.89; DOS ω = 0.86), with associations with eating disorder symptoms, supporting convergent validity. In contrast, the ORTO-R showed weaker reliability (ω = 0.60) and, despite modifications improving some indices (CFI = 0.953, TLI = 0.912, SRMR = 0.044), retained high RMSEA (0.116), indicating limitations. Overall, the TOS and DOS appear reliable tools for assessing orthorexia, whereas the ORTO-R demonstrates psychometric weaknesses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blažev et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: