Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective trial identifies optimal scoring cut-off for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer survivors, suggesting that self-assessment can aid diagnosis.
Background/Objectives: Many patients with breast cancer are treated with chemotherapy, including taxanes. These regimens bear a significant risk of potentially burdensome peripheral neuropathy. A scoring system supported by a neuropathy tracker, which can be self-administered by the patients, likely facilitates and speeds up the diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Before such a scoring system can be used, determination of the optimal cut-off score to discriminate between CIPN and no CIPN is necessary. The prospective NEURO-BREAC trial (NCT07148336) aims to identify the optimal cut-off score in patients treated with chemotherapy and adjuvant irradiation for breast cancer. Methods: The main goal of the NEURO-BREAC trial is to provide the optimal cut-off of a scoring system to discriminate between moderate to severe CIPN and no CIPN in breast cancer survivors previously treated with paclitaxel- or docetaxel-based chemotherapy and irradiation. The scores (0 to 44 points) are obtained by using a neuropathy tracker. This tracker is based on self-evaluation of symptoms and signs of CIPN by study participants. In addition, satisfaction of the patients with the scoring system is assessed. Twenty-four patients (sixteen patients with moderate to severe CIPN and eight patients without CIPN) are required for the Full Analysis Set. Assuming that about 5% of patients will not qualify for this set, 26 patients should be recruited for the NEURO-BREAC trial. The results of this trial are considered an important step for the development of a scoring system contributing to the identification of CIPN in breast cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rades et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: