Randomized controlled trial tests thread embedding acupuncture for facial nerve palsy, indicating potential benefits and monitoring adverse events.
Introduction Facial nerve palsy can result in various sequelae. Recent reviews and clinical studies reported that thread-embedding acupuncture is a safe treatment and can improve facial nerve palsy sequelae. This trial aims to confirm the effectiveness and safety of thread-embedding acupuncture for patients with facial nerve palsy sequelae. Methods A multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded clinical trial will be conducted. One hundred forty-two participants will be recruited by eligibility criteria and be randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group will receive thread-embedding acupuncture in addition to electroacupuncture, while the control group will be given only electroacupuncture. The primary outcome is a change in the physical function score of the Facial Disability Index. The secondary outcome is change in Sunnybrook Facial Grading System, Social/Wellbeing function score of Facial Disability Index, Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire, Numeric Rating Scale of stiffness by facial region, Patient Global Impression of Change, Euro-Qol 5-Dimension 5-level, Economic evaluation questionnaire and adverse events. Assessment points include before treatment (Week 1), after treatment completion (Week 6), 2 weeks post-treatment completion (Week 8, Primary endpoint), and 10 weeks post-treatment completion (Week 16). Conclusion This randomized controlled trial will assess the effectiveness and safety of thread-embedding acupuncture treatment alongside electroacupuncture for facial nerve palsy, using proper sample sizes and rigorous methodologies to address previous research limitations. Clinical trial registration https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=25846&status=5&seq_group=24726&search_page=M , identifier KCT0008551.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: