Mixed methods review shows sustainable organic agriculture reduces food insecurity in smallholder households, indicating improved nutrient intake and income.
This study aimed to undertake a comprehensive mixed methods systematic review to examine the effectiveness of sustainable organic agriculture (SOA) in improving food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Medline (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS/ Elsevier were searched from January 2000 to July 2024. The impact of three types of SOA was evaluated: sustainable intensification practices (SIPs), climate-smart agriculture (CSA), and nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA). Weighted standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% CIs were used to assess between-group differences using random effect models (I2 > 50%). Seventy-eight studies were eligible for inclusion. Compared to non-adopters of SOA, adopters experienced a 16.33% lower prevalence of food insecurity (95%CI: − 21.62, − 11.03, p < 0.001) and a 5.24% lower prevalence of coping strategies (95%CI − 9.06, − 1.41; p < 0.01). They recorded an additional 1019 kg/ha in cereal yield equivalent (95%CI: 397.05, 1641.39, p < 0.01), USD 155.60 in per capita farm food yield revenue (95%CI 89.40, 221.81; p < 0.001), and USD 57 in per capita income (95%CI 17, 97; p < 0.01). They also reported USD 14 higher per capita food consumption expenditure per year (95%CI 6, 21; p < 0.001), a 10.4% increase in food and nutrient intake (95%CI 6.5, 14.3, p < 0.001), 687.4 kcal higher calorie intake (95%CI 302.0, 1072.9; p < 0.001), a 0.90-point increase in dietary diversity score (95%CI 0.62, 1.19, p < 0.001), a 0.14 standard deviation improvement in children’s height-for-age z-scores (95%CI 0.053, 0.225, p < 0.001), and a 0.28-point increase in women’s BMI (95%CI 0.272, 0.292; p < 0.001). Overall, results were significantly consistent across all sub-Saharan regions as well as SIPs and CSA. SOA practices significantly improve food security among smallholder farming households.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Renzaho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: