Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The analysis reveals negation and word order complexities in Spanish stripping, suggesting structural variations exist beyond typical patterns.
Negative stripping refers to cases where a full clause coordinates with a lexical phrase (XP) which is modified by negation (John ate the apples but not the pears). In Spanish, negation (NEG) may follow or precede the XP. While the order XP-NEG uncontroversially involves clausal ellipsis (Depiante 2000), plenty of analyses have been proposed for NEG-XP. In this paper, I claim, based on previous research (cf. Fernández-Sánchez 2019) as well as on new data, that while these strings are better analyzed as what-you-see-is-what-you-get structures, not all NEG-XP sequences are amenable to such an analysis. In particular, I focus on NEG-XP strings under sprouting, i.e. cases where the XP has no correlate in the preceding clause (John ate, but not the apples). For these cases, I defend that they must involve clausal ellipsis coupled with rightward movement of the remnant XP within the to-be-deleted clause. The implication is that, contrary to what is often assumed, the internal make-up of stripping in Spanish cannot be determined a priori based on the word order of NEG and XP, at least not completely: the generalization is that XP-NEG always corresponds to a structure involving clausal ellipsis, while NEG-XP sequences are not always cases of constituent coordination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javier Fernández-Sánchez (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: