Mediation analysis reveals effects of exposure on outcomes in social sciences, suggesting robust alternatives address measurement issues.
Mediation analysis allows empirical researchers to study how an exposure variable affects an outcome variable through one or more intervening variables. Over the years, mediation analysis has become one of the most widely used statistical techniques in the social, behavioral, and medical sciences. Yet the most popular techniques for mediation analysis rely strongly on normality assumptions and are therefore susceptible to the influence of outliers or nonnormal distributions. We review common mediation models and discuss various approaches for estimation and inference, including their implementation in software packages. Moreover, we present robust alternatives, thereby clarifying different notions of robustness. We further consider a setting where the mediation model holds in a latent space but where measurement issues create deviations from normality assumptions in the observed variable space, which is a setting not commonly considered in the literature on robust mediation analysis, and we obtain preliminary results via a simulation study. Finally, we highlight the mechanics and relevance of robust methods in an illustrative empirical application. This article is categorized under: Statistical Models > Linear Models Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Robust Methods Applications of Computational Statistics > Psychometrics
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfons et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: