Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic overview reveals consensus on effective fluoride programmes for childhood caries prevention, targeting at-risk groups.
Objectives: (1) To assess and develop international expert consensus on the evidence for fluoride-based interventions in Early-year-Education settings (EyE-settings; kindergartens/nursery and primary schools) for reducing Early Childhood Caries (ECC) and (2) to synthesise clear programme-level recommendations to prevent ECC in this setting. Basic research design : Systematic overview of systematic reviews, trials, and observational studies to identify and appraise the available evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fluoride-based interventions in EyE-settings. This was followed by a three-stage modified Delphi exercise. Participants: Delphi panel of 21 experts. Main outcome measures : Delphi round 1 online survey: opinions on fluoride-based interventions’ safety, effectiveness and feasibility; Delphi round 2, an iterative survey: group opinions and gather feedback on review findings. Consensus developed via in-depth, recorded group discussions during an online workshop. Results: There was high-quality evidence and consensus that supervised toothbrushing in EyE-settings is safe and cost-effective, shows greater benefit to disadvantaged children, and is feasible in high and low/middle-income countries. There was more moderate support for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish application in EyE-settings (especially where supervised toothbrushing with fluoridated toothpaste is in place). It was agreed that policy-makers should prioritise at-risk groups where resources are limited. Conclusion: Supervised toothbrushing with fluoridated toothpaste is the most effective, cost-effective, feasible and safest mechanism of caries prevention for children in EyE-settings. Universal coverage of toothbrushing in EyE-settings is preferred but targeting to need is indicated where resources are limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abuhaloob et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: