Scoping review reveals role ambiguity among nurses in clinical practice, highlighting the need for competence and professional growth support.
Aim To explore existing research regarding how nurses' unclear responsibilities influence their professional role development in hospital settings. Design A scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley. Methods The Population Exposure Outcome framework was used to identify eligible inclusion and exclusion criteria and search terms. The included articles have been thematically analysed in guidance by Braun and Clarke. Data Sources Twenty‐six studies conducted between 2016 and 2024 were identified in CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus. Results The roles of nurses were highly adaptable within hospital settings and healthcare teams, requiring nurses to assess both organisational shortcomings and colleagues' needs. These assessments depended on the nurses' competence and motivation for professional growth. Conclusion There was a clear need to strengthen organisational structures and frameworks to support the evolving role of nurses. Basic nursing education must be better at preparing nurses for their upcoming leadership role. Impact Increasing complexity and unclear responsibilities contribute to role ambiguity among nurses. The review highlights the importance of recognising nurses as visible and accountable leaders. There is also a need to support nurses' adaptability through improved basic education, which may have implications for both clinical practice and education. Reporting Method The PRISMA Scoping Review checklist was used during the review process. The PRISMA flowchart was used to report the database searches. Patient or Public Contribution This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Björk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: