Analysis of a new method adjusts rate ratio estimates in cohort studies on cancer screening, indicating improved effectiveness evaluation considering contamination and confounding.
Background The effectiveness of an intervention such as cancer screening can be estimated by conducting a cohort study estimating the rate ratio between an exposed group invited to screening and a control group not invited to screening. A common issue is non-compliance, where not all individuals in the study group are exposed. Ignoring non-compliance can result in biased estimates of the exposure effect, but excluding non-exposed individuals may also be problematic as they may differ in risk profile from those who were exposed. A similar problem arises when members of the control group are inadvertently exposed (contamination). Observational studies face additional challenges due to confounding. Objective To report the development of a method to adjust rate ratio estimates in cohort studies for contamination and non-compliance, that also adjusts for confounding. Method Derivation of the new method is outlined. Results The method is illustrated in two examples. Conclusion The results are comparable with a stratified estimate, but through the use of a Poisson regression model the range of possible analyses is extended, for example to tests of confounding factors and interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonsson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: