Assessing inflow forecasting using LTSF and AI methods in dam basins shows spatial variability and phase lag effects.
Reliable inflow forecasting represents a challenging and representative problem in long-horizon time series forecasting. Although long-term time series forecasting (LTSF) algorithms have shown strong performance in other domains, their applicability to hydrological inflow prediction has not yet been systematically assessed. Therefore, this study examined two LTSF linear models for inflow forecasting: NLinear and DLinear. LTSF models were trained with a 24 h input window and evaluated for 24 h lead times at eight major dams in South Korea. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed as a conventional AI model. LSTM consistently achieved the highest coefficient of determination (R2) and the lowest normalized root mean square error, DLinear minimized normalized mean square error, and NLinear delivered superior hydrological consistency as measured by Kling–Gupta efficiency. XGBoost showed comparatively larger variability across sites. Spatial heterogeneity was evident; sites were grouped into high-performing, transition, and vulnerable groups. Peak-flow analysis revealed amplitude attenuation and phase lag at longer horizons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: