Analysis demonstrates geometric thickness problem is existentially R-complete in multigraphs with crossings, indicating significant computational challenges.
We say that a (multi)graph 2G = (2V,2E) has geometric thickness t if there exists a straight-line drawing 2φ :2V → R^2 and a t -coloring of its edges where no two edges sharing a point in their relative interior have the same color. The Geometric Thickness problem asks whether a given multigraph has geometric thickness at most t . This problem was shown to be NP-hard for 2t = 2 (Durocher et al. Comput Geom 56:1–18, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2016.03.003 ). In this paper, we settle the computational complexity of Geometric Thickness by showing that it is ∃ R -complete already for thickness 30 . Moreover, our reduction shows that the problem is ∃ R -complete for 4392 -planar graphs, where a graph is k -planar if it admits a topological drawing with at most k crossings per edge. In the course of our paper we answer previous questions on geometric thickness and on other related problems, in particular that simultaneous graph embeddings of 31 edge-disjoint graphs and pseudo-segment stretchability with chromatic number 30 are ∃ R -complete.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forster et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: