Systematic review reveals meta-analysis shows omentum flap transposition does not improve LARS in rectal resections.
Background/Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the evidence regarding the effect of greater omentum flap transposition (OFT) on low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients who undergo rectal resections. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality assessment was based on the ROBINS-I tool. Analyses were performed by utilizing the Random Effects (RE) model. Results: Overall, three retrospective studies and 100 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis confirmed that OFT did not improve postoperative LARS scores in 3 months (MD: −1.54; 95%CI: −7.30, 4.22; p = 0.6), 6 (MD: 3.75; 95%CI: −20.16, 27.66; p = 0.76) and 9 (MD: −4.86; 95%CI: −28.38, 18.66; p = 0.69) months postoperatively. Similarly, OFT did not impact the overall postoperative morbidity rate (p = 0.1), the pooled operation duration (p = 0.21), and the hospitalization duration (p = 0.21). Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that OFT does not influence postoperative LARS, morbidity, and perioperative efficiency. Given the limited available evidence and several study limitations, further randomized controlled trials are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perivoliotis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: