Case-control study analyzes effects of alcohol flushing response on osteonecrosis risk, revealing no modification found.
Objectives Alcohol consumption is a recognized risk factor for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), as well as hypertension, and malignant tumors. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) activity influences alcohol-associated risks by modulating acetaldehyde metabolism; however, its role in ONFH remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the alcohol flushing response, a proxy for ALDH2, modifies the relationship between alcohol consumption and ONFH. Methods A hospital-based case-control study was conducted on newly diagnosed patients with ONFH and controls recruited. Information on alcohol flushing responses was collected using a self-administered questionnaire and categorized into current/former flushers (inactive ALDH2) and never flushers (active ALDH2). Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) of various levels of alcohol consumption (habitual drinking, heavy drinking, and drinking of ≥320 g/week) were assessed for ONFH using a logistic regression model. Stratified analysis and multiplicative interaction were used to investigate the effect modification by the alcohol flushing response on the association between alcohol consumption and ONFH. Results A total of 118 cases with ONFH and 213 controls were included (mean age, 45 years; 197 men and 134 women). The adjusted ORs of alcohol consumption for the development of ONFH were 1.5 (95% CI: 0.4–6.0) and 3.7 (0.3–41.3) for habitual drinking, 1.6 (0.4–5.6) and 2.0 (0.1–24.2) for heavy drinking, and 3.8 (0.8–17.6) and 4.5 (0.4–49.2) for drinking of ≥320 g/week among current/former and never flushers, respectively. No significant multiplicative interactions were observed. Conclusion Alcohol flushing response may not modify the relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of ONFH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: