Preclinical and pilot trial shows mifepristone improves tumor growth outcomes in high-grade gliomas, suggesting safety and efficacy of treatment.
BACKGROUND The standard treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG) includes chemoradiation after a maximal safe resection. We aimed to develop a translational method to study whether the addition of mifepristone (a glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor inhibitor) to chemoradiation is useful and feasible. METHODS A preclinical study (glioblastoma xenografts) measured the effects of mifepristone (Mf) on tumor size, metabolic activity, and expression of angiogenic factors. A second preclinical study (C6 glioma orthotopical model) measured the effects on proliferation markers (Ki67), tumor growth, MGMT expression, and apoptotic-related protein expression. The third study, a clinical pilot trial involving eight patients with HGG, assessed the safety and clinical efficacy of three different oral doses of mifepristone added to the standard regimen: Scheme 1 = Mf 300mg po daily during radiation, Scheme 2 = Mf 300mg po daily during radiation and each of the adjuvant chemotherapy days, and Scheme 3 = Mf 300mg po from the first day of radiation for 6 months. RESULTS Preclincial studies demonstrated a significant decrease in tumor growth, reduced levels of angiogenesis-promoting VEGF, increased apoptosis-related proteins, and lower expression of drug resistance-associated P-glycoprotein and MGMT. Clinically, Scheme 1 (n = 3) had an overall survival (OS) of 9.6, 10, and 13.8 months; Scheme 2 (n = 3) had OS of 19.4, 19.6, and 22.2 months, and Scheme 3 (n = 2) are still alive after 72.1 and 81.7 months. No CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 toxicities were reported, and none of the patients had an increase in their PRO-CTCAE scores. The median NANO score improvement after Mf was - 5 points (-2 to -9), and the median maximal QLQ-BN20 improvement was 40 points (8 to 45). Improvements in most of QLQ-C30 were also reported. CONCLUSION The addition of mifepristone to chemoradiation is associated with multiple mechanisms of action against HGG and is clinically safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Díaz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: