Novel screening reveals differential responses and off-target effects in glioblastoma models, suggesting targeted therapies with CDK4/6 inhibitors may be effective.
Identifying drug sensitivities that will translate to clinical practice for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) necessitates the use of a variety of cell models that recapitulate the heterogeneity of the disease. Screening of large drug libraries against numerous models is challenging due to both cost and complexity. We utilized a barcode-labeled, pooled system (CARPOOL) of a 23-member set of genomically characterized glioma spheroid cell (GSC) models to evaluate the in vitro response of a library of 728 brain-penetrant compounds. Responses were validated using individual, representative GSCs. The library included 164 drugs associated with oncologic applications, and almost two-thirds of the compounds have been or are currently in clinical development. A total of 450 (61.8%) showed response in at least a subset of models, with only 8 (1.8%) demonstrating broad vs. selective/differential response. Of the drugs previously unknown in oncology, 299 (53%) exhibited differential responses across the GSCs. Clustering compounds based on response across GSCs closely grouped those with shared mechanisms of action. Interestingly, potential, often novel, off-target responses were identified, including TIC10 (ONC201, dordaviprone) clustering with microtubule inhibitors, and an NPY1R inhibitor clustering with an MDM2-p53 inhibitor. Further genomic analyses identified specific associations with response, both previously known and novel, including RB1 mutation and alterations in response to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Interrogation of reverse phase protein array (RPPA) data from the GSCs identified associations between drug response and protein levels, such as Cyclin E1 levels with CDK4/6 response, and phosphorylated c-Raf with histone deacetylase inhibitor response. Furthermore, select compounds were tested in combination with radiotherapy to identify potential radiosensitizers that could enhance therapeutic synergy. Our study presents a novel approach for advancing drug discovery for rapid preclinical evaluation and identifies not only responding subsets but also potential selective, molecular biomarkers for downstream incorporation into clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: