Prospective case series reveals acceptable safety and significant treatment effects in recurrent high-grade glioma patients undergoing salvage surgery.
BACKGROUND While hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy (SIAC) have shown promise for recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG), the perioperative safety profile and histopathological effects of salvage surgery following this combined modality approach remain poorly characterized. METHODS We prospectively evaluated 5 consecutive rHGG patients (4 glioblastoma, 1 anaplastic astrocytoma) who underwent HFRT (30Gy/10 fractions) followed by SIAC (teniposide 50mg/m²) as a bridge to salvage surgery at our institution between January 2025 and May 2025. Comprehensive perioperative metrics included: (1) treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE v5.0), (2) surgical timing and technical parameters, (3) 90-day postoperative complications, and (4) systematic histopathological assessment of treatment effects using the RANO-PATH criteria. RESULTS Treatment tolerance: All patients completed HFRT-SIAC with only grade 1-2 toxicities (transient blurred vision 20%, headache 40%);Surgical outcomes: Median SIAC-to-surgery interval 26 days (IQR 21-30); mean operative time 4.2±0.8 hours; median blood loss 300mL (200-500) Safety profile: No 30-day mortality; No asymptomatic deep vein thrombosisHistopathological findings: 3 specimens (60%) showed >50% tumor necrosis with prominent vascular hyalinization; 2 demonstrated marked reduction in mitotic figures CONCLUSION This prospective analysis demonstrates that salvage surgery following HFRT-SIAC is feasible with acceptable perioperative risks in selected rHGG patients. The significant histopathological treatment effects observed support the biological activity of this approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: