Analysis explores the philosophical implications of the term qua, highlighting its significance through Aristotle and Kant.
The Latin term “qua” is used occasionally in ordinary discourse but more often as a philosophical term of art. Its purpose is sometimes to avoid what would otherwise be contradictions, as in “necessarily two‐legged qua cyclist, contingently two‐legged qua mathematician.” In this paper, I identify and clarify several of the philosophical uses of “qua,” approving some and criticizing others. I discuss the use of “qua” in connection with six different authors: David Lewis, Kit Fine, and Donald Davidson in Part One, and Aristotle, Spinoza, and Kant in Part Two.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cleve et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: