This analysis compares blood glucose measurements in neonates, suggesting discrepancies between testing methods impact screening for hypoglycemia.
Introduction/Objective Neonatal hypoglycemia can lead to neurodevelopmental impairment if untreated. In our institution, infants with risk factors are screened for hypoglycemia. Blood glucose levels (BGL) are measured using Point-of-care (POC) Accu-Chek Inform II, with values below 50 mg/dL requiring confirmation via the POC Radiometer ABL90 Flex Plus or Beckman Coulter AU5800. Methods/Case Report This study compares neonatal BGL below 50 mg/dL across these platforms. The results were analyzed using EP Evaluator for Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Comparison of BGL (22-50 mg/dL; 54 neonates) between Accu-Chek and ABL90 showed a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.5581, with a slope of 1.664 and a mean bias of 0.1. Comparison of BGL (17-47 mg/dL; 18 neonates) between Accu-Chek and AU5800 showed an R of 0.976, with a slope of 0.968 and mean bias of 2.1. Conclusion For neonatal BGL below 50 mg/dL, the results from Accu-Chek showed a poor correlation with the ABL90 results, while demonstrating a good correlation with the results from AU5800, the standard method. Therefore, neonatal BGLs that are below 50 mg/dL but above the critical value of 40 mg/dL do not necessitate additional confirmation. This approach helps minimize unnecessary sample collections and laboratory testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: