Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report reveals unrecognized indolent tumor in liver, suggesting implications for diagnosis and treatment.
Introduction/Objective The current classification of biphasic hepatic tumors includes only combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. In contrast, indolent or benign biphenotypic hepatic neoplasms remain unrecognized and unclassified. We report a nonmalignant hepatic neoplasm with bland hepatocellular and cholangiolar features and indolent clinical behavior. Methods/Case Report A 37-year-old female with history of adrenal adenoma presented with multiple hepatic lesions with the largest 9.0 cm in left lobe. Left hepatectomy revealed a well-circumscribed mass in a non-cirrhotic liver with positive margin. Histologically, 60% of the tumor showed bland hepatocellular adenomatous proliferation (arginase +, CK7/CK19-) with immunoprofile not consistent with any known subtype of hepatocellular adenoma or carcinoma. The remaining 40% exhibited bland cholangiolar differentiation (CK7/CK19 +, arginase-) in a punctate, interspersed distribution, forming discrete foci with lumen-like structures scattered throughout the neoplastic hepatocellular background. The cholangiolar component lacked mitotic activity, necrosis, or stromal invasion. Molecular testing showed no TERT or KRAS mutations. The patient remains recurrence-free on imaging over three years, with other stable residual liver lesions, supporting an indolent clinical course. Results NA Conclusion This case represents a previously unrecognized benign-appearing biphasic hepatic neoplasm. Recognizing such unclassified indolent tumors is essential to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment, and to prompt further study of their biology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haw et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: