Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis reveals pressure measurements in mixed flows during storms, indicating the need for mitigation strategies.
Transient mixed flows—marked by rapid free-surface/pressurized transitions and strong air–water interaction—frequently arise in urban drainage conduits during intense storms and can trigger damaging pressure excursions. This study examines unsteady hydraulics in a 20 m, 0.15 m-diameter sloping acrylic pipe over a systematic matrix of dimensionless inflow Q* and downstream submergence y*. Synchronized crown–invert pressure measurements and high-speed imaging were used to capture transient pressure signatures, front propagation, and air pocket migration. Six regimes (types 1–6) were identified and organized into a regime map in (Q*, y*). Initial peak positive pressures vary non-monotonically with y*: A slight increase at low submergence is followed by sharp amplification upon formation of a pressurized front, attenuation under outlet sealing without strong compression, and renewed amplification once y* > 1.0. Minimum negative pressure behavior is mechanism dependent: Type 3 exhibits moderate minima associated with long duration rarefaction, whereas types 4 and 5 produce much deeper but short-lived minima. At type boundaries, minima attenuate as the dominant mechanism shifts and energy is dissipated during early sealing–unsealing. These results provide a mechanistic basis for surge prediction and mitigation (ventilation layout, inflow control, pressure relief) and supply well-instrumented data for validating mixed flow models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: