Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experiments demonstrate that lysosome release helps macrophages resist NK and CTL killing, suggesting a role in pathogen sheltering.
Description Compared to HIV-infected CD4+ T cells, macrophages are more resistant to NK cell and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-mediated killing, but the mechanism of resistance is unclear. As melanoma cells use lysosome release to repair perforin pores to escape CTL attack, we hypothesized that HIV-infected macrophages do the same to protect them from NKs and CTL. To test this hypothesis, monocytes from PBMC were differentiated into macrophages and CD4+ T cells were activated using anti-CD3/CD28, then infected with HIV, CRISPR-edited to knockout (KO) β2-microglobulin (B2M) (NK cell trigger), or peptide-loaded (CTL trigger). Co-cultures with NKs and CTL were analyzed via flow cytometry and microscopy. NK and CTL-mediated killing is perforin-dependent, and assays with purified perforin suggest that macrophages are also more resistant to perforin-mediated lysis. In response to NK or CTL attack, as well as purified perforin, surface CD107a (a marker of lysosome release) increased on infected, B2M-KO, and peptide-loaded macrophages, but not CD4+ T cells. Like melanoma cells, this could contribute to perforin pore repair and resistance to killing. As lysosomal release is observed in B2M-KO and peptide-loaded macrophages, this resistance mechanism may represent an intrinsic trait of macrophages rather than a viral-mediated response, which could render macrophages a perfect “hide out” for various pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and human cytomegalovirus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grasberger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: