Analysis reveals gaps in executive compensation versus worker pay in Portugal, indicating potential business ethics concerns.
The debate regarding executive compensation frequently arises, questioning management models, the fairness of the distribution of surpluses generated by companies, and their relation to corporate performance. In this context, the relationship between executive compensation and the wages of other employees gains significance and is a topic discussed in various countries. For some, this is merely the result of market mechanisms. In contrast, for others, concerns arise from (potential) information asymmetry between managers and shareholders, discussions about the purpose of companies, and the boundaries of business ethics.This study examines wage asymmetry in Portugal using data from the largest companies listed on the Euronext Lisbon stock exchange. It employs the ratio between the CEO's annual compensation and the average annual worker salary—a proxy for the CEO–Worker Pay Ratio, which publicly listed companies in the United States are required to disclose. Portugal presents a compelling case for analysis, as it occupies a distinct position within the framework of varieties of capitalism and ranks among the European Union countries with significant income distribution asymmetries. Our findings suggest that, while wage asymmetry in these companies is substantial, it remains lower than in several other European countries, and particularly the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: