Analysis reveals existential principles impact social responsibilities and collaborations in Auster’s human reality depiction.
The existential aspect of the social nature of human reality, defined as “for-itself-for-others” in Sartre’s philosophy, determines humankind in terms of communal contributions for the establishment of an ideal society of interpersonal relations and collaborations. Such community requires one’s selfhood shaped in accordance with the well-being of others, best manifested in the Sartrean concept of “for-itself- for-others”. In Auster’s The Brooklyn Follies, in existential terms, Nathan Glass, the protagonist, leads an authentic life both on personal and social levels towards Sartre’s principle. In this light, Nathan represents the human potency to organize the chaotic network of interpersonal associations when an individual is conscious of human freedom of choice and social responsibilities and tries to help others acquire the same level of awareness. As such, he is a portrait of the concept of “for-itself-for-others” in managing the network of his relationships with other community members. This paper, highlighting Nathan’s role as the architect of Auster’s urban utopia, shows how the Sartrean concept above can realistically manifest itself within a chaotic society on the edge of collapse around the turn of the century in the USA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: