This research categorizes forest maps using remote sensing and statistical analysis, highlighting conservation and industry impacts.
The aim of the study is thematic classification of forest maps on the basis of analysis and evaluation of their content, methodological bases of creation, including within the framework of small-scale atlas mapping. Forest maps are spatial-temporal, symbolic models that reflect the multidimensional nature of forests, their importance in the development and interaction of nature and society. In a broad sense and within the framework of this work, they are understood as all maps whose content is related to natural, socio-economic and environmental aspects of forest mapping. The basis for achieving the goal is rich theoretical and methodological experience in creating forest maps for Russia, its individual entities and macro-regions, such as the Baikal region, the Baikal basin, etc. Examples include the small-scale maps developed by authors and presented in a number of published complex atlases. Their development is carried out using methods of mathematical-statistical and expert analysis, remote sensing, geo-information modeling, etc. As a result of the study, forest maps are divided into seven main classification groups: maps of forests and their main characteristics; spatial management of forests; productivity and restoration, functions of forests and forest resources; forest industry; forest conservation, protection; forest ecological (forestry-ecological) situations; history of the study and development of forests. Map content reflects: location and condition of forests; assessment of resource, ecological and social functions of forests; types of use of forests; location and water performance of forest industries; forest disturbance caused by adverse natural and anthropogenic factors; natural fire hazard of forests, etc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E.L. Makarenko (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: