Analysis reveals significance of community-controlled archival practices for disabled people, indicating potential for heritage institutions.
This article examines how disabled people can achieve meaningful control over archival collections that document their history and struggles. Using Manchester’s Disabled People’s Archive as a case study, it demonstrates how democratic governance structures and comprehensive accessibility strategies can ensure archives serve disabled communities rather than simply describing them. The authors argue for extending such community-controlled approaches to mainstream heritage institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clarke et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: