Culturally secure methods improve emotional regulation and self-awareness in Aboriginal youth, suggesting effective longitudinal data collection.
Purpose: Yawardani Jan-ga (Horses Helping) (YJ) is an Aboriginal-specific, culturally secure equine-assisted learning (EAL) program in the Kimberley region of Western Australia (WA). It was collaboratively designed with local Aboriginal children and young people, Elders, service providers and content experts – including specialists in trauma-informed practice, child development and implementation science. This program addresses the complex social, emotional, spiritual and wellbeing needs (SEWB) of Aboriginal children and young people aged 6 to 26 years. Utilising a strengths-based learning model, participants engage with horses to develop vital life skills, such as communication, self-awareness and emotional regulation, fostering their SEWB. While EAL has been applied internationally with Aboriginal populations, its adoption in Australia is still expanding. Methods: This methodology paper outlines (a) the standardisation of the YJ EAL program’s design and implementation, ensuring consistent, methodologically sound practices; and (b) a culturally secure, multimodal, multi-informant qualitative approach for collecting contextually relevant, longitudinal data on participant experiences. The methods were designed to capture the subtleties of human–horse interactions, prioritise participant narratives, and integrate strengths-based techniques resonant with Aboriginal learning preferences and cultural perspectives. These methods diverge from traditional physiological and psychological EAL assessments, offering culturally relevant and ecologically valid evaluations. Principal conclusions: The methodologies presented in the current paper are being evaluated through a longitudinal qualitative study. This pioneering Aboriginal-led initiative sets a precedent for employing culturally secure methods to gather qualitative phenomenological data in the EAL field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coffin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: