Analysis reveals how Ambedkar's Buddhism redefines karma with ethical values, indicating a unique modernist approach.
Where most other Buddhist modernist movements enjoy state support or sanction of some kind and often long histories of monastic organization as well as reception by Euro-American elites, B. R. Ambedkar’s marginal position necessarily produces a Buddhist modernist expression distinct in values and aims from non-marginal arrangements. His Buddhist modernism shares the individualist, rational, scientifically compatible frames found in many other modernist Buddhist iterations. But Ambedkar replaces the romantic and psychospiritual orientations of Euro-American frames with ethical and justice discourses in his reading of karma. This discussion of karma further unsettles any moves towards a hegemonic definition of this South Asian concept.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timothy Loftus (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: