Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals stakeholder participation improved in Lithuania’s National Agreement on Forests, indicating progress in policy coherence and governance.
This study explores Lithuania’s National Agreement on Forests (NAF) as a potential framework for better forest governance, focusing on its alignment with the principles set by the Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE). Through document analysis, stakeholder interviews, and power analysis, we assess how well the NAF fosters inclusiveness, inter-sectoral collaboration, long-term commitment, and capacity building. Our findings reveal that while the NAF has made notable progress in improving stakeholder participation, challenges persist in integrating different sectors and addressing conflicts between economic and ecological priorities. Overall, the study concludes that the NAF is a step forward toward a National Forest Programme, though it needs further refinement to achieve long-term sustainability and policy coherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makrickienė et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: