PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Sustainability3 citationsOpen Access

Digital–Physical Integration and Carbon Productivity: An Empirical Assessment from China

View Full Paper
RSRui ShenYGYeqiang GengXGXiaoqin Gong

Key Points

  • Carbon productivity increases with enhanced digital technologies that support green innovation and resource efficiency.
  • A significant finding indicates digital integration fosters improvements in industrial structure by promoting low-carbon configurations.
  • Using a provincial-level patent co-classification framework, this analysis examines the relationship between digital integration and carbon productivity.
  • The results imply that advancing digital integration is crucial for achieving sustainable development goals in China.

Abstract

The integration of digital technologies with the physical economy has emerged as a crucial driver of sustainable and high-quality development. Drawing on a patent co-classification framework, this study constructs a provincial-level indicator of digital–real integration in China to evaluate its influence on carbon productivity and the underlying mechanisms. The empirical findings show that digital–real integration exerts a clear and statistically significant positive impact on carbon productivity. Moreover, the improvement in carbon productivity occurs mainly through three channels: green technological innovation, adjustments in industrial structure toward upgrading, and enhancements in resource allocation efficiency. Industrial upgrading is reflected in the gradual shift toward more advanced and low-carbon industrial configurations, whereas the allocation channel captures the coordinated optimization of traditional and emerging production factors. Regarding the nonlinearity, a threshold pattern is identified between digital–real integration and carbon productivity, shaped by the degree of biased technological progress. When the technological bias remains low, the productivity gains are modest; once the bias surpasses a certain critical level, the positive effect of integration intensifies substantially. The magnitude of this threshold effect also varies by bias type, with capital-biased technological progress producing the strongest influence. Overall, the results provide theoretical and policy implications for advancing digital–real integration and supporting a green and low-carbon transition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b94341d383f2b2a37876chttps://doi.org/10.3390/su172310598
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper