PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Cancer Discovery2 citations

Molecular and immune correlates of response to first-line de-escalated chemotherapy plus penpulimab and anlotinib in advanced cervical cancer

View Full Paper
QXQin XuZDZhengrong DengJLJing Liu

Key Points

  • 93.8% of patients had an objective response to treatment, with strong indications for survival benefits.
  • The study utilized a multicenter, single-arm design to assess treatment efficacy in cervical cancer patients.
  • Analysis revealed enhanced chemotaxis and active tumor-infiltrating T cells associated with better outcomes.
  • Findings suggest that the combination therapy may promote favorable survival rates, emphasizing its clinical relevance.

Abstract

Abstract Standard of care for advanced cervical cancer includes chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic and/or immune checkpoint blockade regimens. Although effective, it leads to pleiotropic side effects. De-escalation chemotherapy together with immunotargeted therapies have been proven effective and less toxic in other cancers. Here, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study of first-line de-escalated platinum-based chemotherapy plus anlotinib and penpulimab, followed by maintenance therapy solely with anlotinib and penpulimab in PD-L1 positive, persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients. Of 32 efficacy evaluable patients, 30 (93.8%, 95% CI: 79.2% to 99.2%) had an investigators-confirmed objective response. Single nucleus RNA sequencing implied enhanced chemotaxis and proliferative activity of tumor-infiltrating T cells and activated germinal-center B cells portended optimal treatment response. Patients with a high TLS-to-tumor area ratio exhibited better survival. Our findings lay the groundwork for the feasibility of first-line de-escalated chemotherapy plus anlotinib and penpulimab in metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b943e1d383f2b2a378b59https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-25-1315
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper