Case series reveals associations between butyrylcholinesterase activity and urinary malathion levels, indicating diagnostic precision may improve.
Background Accurate and prompt assessment of malathion intoxication severity remains a significant clinical challenge, often hampered by reliance on single diagnostic markers. This exploratory case series investigated the combined utility of rapid butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activity measurements and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) for quantifying urinary malathion to enhance diagnostic precision. Methods We investigated three independent patients admitted with acute malathion intoxication. BChE activity was measured using both a point-of-care (POCT) device and a laboratory-based enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT). Urinary malathion was quantified using a validated GC-MS/MS method. Results Malathion exposure was confirmed in all patients via urinary analysis. Strong per-case positive correlations (r ranging from 0.905 to 0.996) were observed between the two BChE measurement methods, though Bland-Altman analysis revealed noteworthy discrepancies (mean bias of 10%, limits of agreement ranging from −20% to 40%). Critically, statistically significant inverse correlations ( p < 0.05) were identified between urinary malathion concentrations and both BChE activity measurements, underscoring the dynamic relationship between exposure and enzymatic inhibition. Conclusion These findings, derived from a small, exploratory case series, suggest the importance of an integrated diagnostic approach for malathion intoxication. This combined strategy may support improved assessment of severity and prognosis in individual cases, offering insights into the pesticide’s systemic impact and elimination kinetics, especially when exposure details are unclear. While rapid BChE tests are valuable for initial screening, their interpretation should occur within this multi-marker framework. The generalizability of these findings is limited by the small sample size, and no formal power calculation was performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hîrjău et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: