PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism4 citations

Clinical and Pathological Spectrum of Acromegaly: Distinguishing GH-PitNETs, Mammosomatotrophs and Mixed Tumors

View Full Paper
RMRebeca Martinez-HernandezFMFernando F. Méndez-GarcíaASAna Serrano-Somavilla

Key Points

  • Higher PRL levels noted in mammosomatotrophs compared to GH-PitNETs, indicating a significant clinical difference between these tumor types.
  • Double immunofluorescence quantitated GH and PRL expression in 51 PitNETs, enhancing our understanding of acromegaly's pathology.
  • Mixed SL-PitNETs displayed lower SSTR2 expression, while GH-PitNETs presented with elevated SSTR5 levels, influencing treatment strategies.
  • These findings highlight the complexity of GH&PRL-PitNETs, underscoring the importance of adjusting therapies based on specific tumor characteristics.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Acromegaly is a rare disease usually caused by a pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) that produces growth hormone (GH-PitNET). Tumors secreting GH and prolactin (GH&PRL-PitNETs), contribute up to 30% to the spectrum of acromegaly and have been attributed a more aggressive behaviour. GH&PRL PitNETs can be classified in two predominant phenotypes: mammosomatotroph arising from a single-cell population of Pit-1 lineage and mixed somatotroph–lactotroph PitNETs (mixed SL-PitNETs). Purpose To evaluate clinical and molecular differences between GH-PitNET, mammosomatotroph, and mixed SL-PitNETs. Methods We quantified GH and PRL expression by double immunofluorescence in 51 PitNETs (23 GH-PitNETs, 20 mammosomatotrophs, and 8 mixed SL-PitNETs) from patients with acromegaly. These findings were correlated with clinical data and histologic markers such as SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR5, E-cadherin, and CAM 5.2. Results Our results did not reveal significant differences in GH or IGF-1 levels between GH- PitNETs and mixed SL-PitNETs, but PRL levels were significantly higher in mammosomatotrophs. Tumor size and invasiveness were comparable between the two groups. Interestingly, 41% of PRL-positive tumors did not show hyperprolactinemia representing silent PRL-positive GH PitNETs. Mixed SL-PitNETs exhibited reduced SSTR2 expression, while GH-PitNETs exhibit higher SSTR5 levels. Moreover, all tumors lacking cytokeratin expression were non-responders to medical therapy. Conclusion These findings highlight the heterogeneity within GH&PRL-PitNETs, including silent PRL-positive GH PitNETs. Our data suggest mixed-SL tumors may be less responsive to somatostatin receptor ligands, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies based on tumor subtype and receptor profile.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martinez-Hernandez et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b944c1d383f2b2a378c0dhttps://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf634
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The outcome of surgery in 668 patients with acromegaly using current criteria of biochemical ‘cure’2005 · 506 citations
  2. 2The pituitary stalk effect: is it a passing phenomenon?2014 · 47 citations
  3. 3GH and Prolactin co-secreting Adenomas: It Is Time for a Definition2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with PIT1/SF1 co-expression show distinct clinicopathological and molecular features2024 · 48 citations
  5. 5Molecular profiling for acromegaly treatment: a validation study2020 · 70 citations