Examination shows improved detection and captioning performance in remote sensing, suggesting VLMs can better adapt to this domain.
Vision-Language Models(VLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in interpreting natural scene imagery. However, their generalization to domain-specific applications, such as remote sensing, remains underexplored. We address this gap by introducing a refined methodology centered on language-driven prompt optimization, with the aim of enhancing the adaptability of VLMs to remote sensing tasks. Specifically, we adopt a two-stage evaluation framework comprising Zero-Shot Prompting and Prompt- Informed Supervised Fine-Tuning. In the first stage, we assess the influence of prompt formulation on zero-shot performance. In the second stage, we further explore how the incorporation of optimized prompts during supervised fine-tuning can help reveal the model’s generalization potential. Within this framework, we introduce two prompting strategies tailored for remote sensing: Cognitively-Guided Prompting (CogPrompt), which employs Chain-of-Thought reasoning to elicit structured and interpretable responses; and Knowledge-Injected Prompting (KnowPrompt), which incorporates domain-specific priors through existence assertions. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of several open-source VLMs, including Qwen-VL, InternVL, and the LLaVA series, across multiple remote sensing benchmarks, including remote sensing object detection and captioning. To support our analysis, we propose a two-stage evaluation framework, including Zero-Shot Prompting and Prompt-Informed Supervised Fine-Tuning. Extensive experimental results show that prompt optimization consistently enhances overall detection and captioning performance across a range of metrics, and there is still significant room for improvement in the capabilities of VLMs for remote sensing tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: