PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025BMC Nephrology2 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence–based diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease using urinary VOC biosensor data

View Full Paper
CKChatchai KreepalaWAWatcharapong AnakkamateeAPAnawin Pechbooranin

Key Points

  • Random Forest achieved 86% accuracy, outperforming other classifiers in diagnosing diabetic kidney disease.
  • A total of 127 urine samples were analyzed, involving four distinct diagnostic groups for classification.
  • Assessment utilized various metrics including AUC, precision, and F1-score to evaluate model performance.
  • Findings highlight the potential for AI models to support earlier identification of diabetic kidney disease in nephrology practice.

Abstract

Abstract Background Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains a leading cause of chronic kidney disease worldwide. However, current diagnostic methods rely on indirect biomarkers or invasive renal biopsy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of urinary volatile organic compound (VOC) profiling, combined with machine learning, for non-invasive classification of DKD. Methods Urine samples were collected from 127 participants divided into four diagnostic groups: healthy controls, patients with type 2 diabetes without nephropathy, biopsy-confirmed DKD, and patients with primary nephrotic syndromes. Samples were analyzed using a chemiresistive VOC biosensor. A total of 15,240 signal-derived features were extracted based on sensor response dynamics. Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to balance class sizes. Four machine learning classifiers—Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Naïve Bayes—were trained and validated using stratified data. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Random Forest achieved the best test performance, with 86% accuracy, 0.91 precision, 0.86 recall, F1-score of 0.86, and an AUC of 0.95. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model’s robustness and generalizability. Random Forest consistently outperformed other models in distinguishing DKD from both diabetic and non-diabetic glomerular diseases, demonstrating its strong discriminative capability. Conclusions Urinary VOC-based machine learning models provide proof-of-concept evidence for non-invasive DKD diagnosis. Random Forest, in particular, shows potential as a triage tool to differentiate DKD from other glomerular conditions, which may in the future help reduce reliance on biopsy and support earlier identification in nephrology practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kreepala et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b94581d383f2b2a378e7dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04608-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Breath Analysis: Identification of Potential Volatile Biomarkers for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Urinary cancer detection by the target urine volatile organic compounds biosensor platform2024 · 12 citations
  3. 32. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—20232022 · 2,485 citations
  4. 4Changing epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and associated chronic kidney disease2015 · 749 citations
  5. 5Random Forests2001 · 131,455 citations