Review highlights homeodynamics as a framework for understanding complex systems and transitions in social systems, indicating its relevance in psychology and organizational theory.
This review traces the historical evolution, conceptual foundations, and contemporary applications of the term homeodynamics across biological, ecological, cognitive, and social systems. Initially coined in the 19th century but largely forgotten, the term re-emerged in the second half of the 20th century as scholars sought to describe dynamic stability in open, self-organizing systems. From Yates’s theoretical formalization in biology to Rattan’s work in biogerontology and recent applications in psychology and organizational theory, homeodynamics has progressively evolved from a synonym of homeostasis to a distinct systems concept. It now denotes the capacity of complex systems to sustain coherence through transitions between multiple temporary equilibria, integrating feedbacks, bifurcations, and adaptive reconfigurations. By revisiting the term’s lineage, this review clarifies its epistemological scope and proposes its use as a heuristic and modeling framework for understanding dynamic stability and regime shifts in living and social systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
PETITJEAN et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: