PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025BMC Medicine5 citationsOpen Access

Does ambient PM2.5 reduce the protective association of leisure-time physical activity with mortality? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and individual-level pooled analysis of cohort studies involving 1.5 million adults

View Full Paper
PKPo Wen KuASAndrew SteptoeMHMark Hamer

Key Points

  • Higher PM2.5 levels correspond to diminished protective benefits from leisure-time physical activity on all-cause mortality.
  • Meta-analysis included 1,515,094 adults, showing reduced mortality risk by approximately 30% at PM2.5 < 25 μg/m3 but only 12-15% at higher levels.
  • Cox regression modeling of harmonized data confirms the negative impact of PM2.5 on mortality outcomes associated with physical activity.
  • These findings highlight the critical link between air quality and health, particularly in regards to mortality related to exercise.

Abstract

Abstract Background This study assessed whether higher levels of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) reduce the protective effects of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) on all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality, and explored the PM 2.5 threshold beyond which attenuation occurs. Methods We conducted two complementary investigations. First, a systematic review and meta-analysis (per PRISMA guidelines) identified eligible cohort studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and SPORTDiscus (from inception to 6 January 2025) that examined the independent or joint associations of LTPA and PM₂.₅ with mortality among adults (≥ 18 years). Second, an individual-level pooled analysis using harmonized data from three cohorts was performed using Cox regression modeling to assess the associations observed in the meta-analysis. Results In Study One, a total of seven cohort studies ( n = 1,515,094; deaths = 115,196) were included in the meta-analysis, revealing that the reduction in all-cause mortality risk diminished with higher PM 2.5 exposure. Meeting the recommended LTPA level (7.5–15 MET-h/week) reduced all-cause mortality risk by approximately 30% at PM 2.5 < 25 μg/m 3 but only 12–15% at 25 + μg/m 3 . Study Two (three cohorts; n = 869,038; deaths = 45,080) confirmed this pattern. Individuals meeting the recommended LTPA level (7.5–15 MET-h/week) had a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to those in the highest-risk group (reference: < 1 MET-h/week and PM 2.5 : 35–50 μg/m 3 ). Hazard ratios (HRs) varied by PM 2.5 exposure, with lower HRs indicating a greater protective effect: 35–50 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.93), 25–35 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57–0.79), 15–25 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.29–0.39), 10–15 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28–0.41), and < 10 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.25–0.37). Higher levels of LTPA were generally associated with lower all-cause and cause-specific mortality across most PM₂.₅ exposure categories, but the protective effects were attenuated at PM₂.₅ levels 25 + μg/m 3 for all outcomes and became non-significant for cancer mortality at 35–50 μg/m 3 . Conclusions LTPA is beneficial for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality even at relatively high PM 2.5 levels, with greater benefits observed under cleaner air conditions. However, its protective effects are attenuated at 25 + μg/m 3 for all outcomes and become less evident at 35–50 μg/m 3 , particularly for cancer mortality. PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42023395364.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ku et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b9d931d383f2b2a379c1dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04496-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper