PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Small4 citations

Tuning the Selectivity for High Yield Ammonia Production in Electrochemical Nitrate Reduction using Sulfur and Nitrogen‐Rich Carbon Catalyst

View Full Paper
ACAkansha ChaturvediKGKalpana GargTNTharamani C. Nagaiah

Key Points

  • Higher ammonia production achieved with sulfur and nitrogen‐rich carbon catalyst, leading to improved reaction kinetics.
  • Catalyst shows 97.83% Faradaic efficiency for ammonia and only about 0.69% for nitrite.
  • Analysis using in‐situ Raman spectroscopy provides insights into the reduction pathway and hydrogenation.
  • Study suggests that catalyst design influences selectivity in electrochemical nitrate reduction.

Abstract

Abstract The electrocatalytic nitrate (NO 3 − ) reduction reaction (NO 3 RR) offers a promising pathway for synthesizing value‐added ammonia (NH 3 ) while removing NO 3 − pollutants. However, this reaction is hindered by NO 3 − adsorption and slow kinetics involving multiple proton and electron transfer steps. In pursuit of an efficient catalyst, a sulfur and nitrogen‐rich carbon catalyst, SNC 700, with a cuboidal morphology is presented for selective electrochemical NO 3 − reduction to NH 3 . The SNC 700 catalyst exhibited a higher NH 3 Faradaic efficiency (F.E.) of 97.83% and an extremely low F.E. of nitrite (NO 2 − , ≈ 0.69%) compared to the counterpart NC 700 catalyst (F.E. NH3 42.85%, F.E. NO2‐ 9.92%) at a potential of −0.6 V vs. RHE. Complementary insights from in‐situ Raman spectroscopy and microelectrochemical studies revealed the reaction pathway, highlighting a rapid reduction of NO 3 − intermediate and more favorable hydrogenation over SNC 700 catalyst compared to NC 700. This suggests that incorporating sulfur into the nitrogen‐containing carbon structure enhances hydrogen adsorption, leading to improved NO 3 − to NH 3 selectivity. This work presents a straightforward and practical approach to address the challenges of limited NO 3 − reduction selectivity, particularly for carbon‐based materials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaturvedi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b9d9a1d383f2b2a37a119https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202509526
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1High yield ammonia production via glucose oxidation assisted electrochemical nitrate reduction2025 · 14 citations
  2. 2Long-life Li/polysulphide batteries with high sulphur loading enabled by lightweight three-dimensional nitrogen/sulphur-codoped graphene sponge2015 · 1,058 citations
  3. 3The role of reticular chemistry in the design of CO2 reduction catalysts2018 · 734 citations
  4. 4Polydopamine‐Inspired, Dual Heteroatom‐Doped Carbon Nanotubes for Highly Efficient Overall Water Splitting2016 · 410 citations
  5. 5Dioxygen Reduction by Nitrogen‐Rich Mesoporous Carbon bearing Electrodeposited Silver Particles2015 · 17 citations