Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical evaluation demonstrates that targeted nanomedicine enhances tumor regression in pancreatic cancer, indicating improved treatment efficacy.
Background This study presents a novel targeted nanomedicine for pancreatic cancer imaging and local magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT): urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-targeted, indocyanine green (ICG)-conjugated ferrimagnetic vortex iron oxide (FVIOs) nanorings (u-I-FVIOs). uPAR is a cancer-selective membrane protein, ICG is a clinically approved near-infrared (NIR) dye, and FVIOs are well-characterized nanorings with high efficiency in heat conversion under alternating magnetic field (AMF). Methods & Results We systematically evaluated the physicochemical and biological properties of u-I-FVIOs and demonstrated their tumor targeting capacity and AMF-dependent cancer cytotoxicity. Following intravenous (I.V.) administration, u-I-FVIOs produced robust fluorescence and MRI signals in tumors, achieving a tumor-to-background ratio of 3.5–4.5 at 12–24 h post-injection, compared with 2.5–3.0 for I-FVIOs and 1.5–2.5 for the ICG group. In a PANC-1 subcutaneous pancreatic tumor mouse model, animals received one of four treatments: Blank, Blank + AMF, u-I-FVIOs, or u-I-FVIOs + AMF. The Blank and u-I-FVIOs were administered intratumorally (I.T.), AMF exposure was applied for 600 s after the I.T. injections. u-I-FVIOs + AMF resulted in near-complete tumor regression (tumor suppression rate: 93%; mixed-effects model: P = 0.0001) and significantly prolonged survival (Log-rank test: HR = 0.12, P = 0.009) compared to the Blank control group. In contrast, the u-I-FVIOs–only group showed no antitumor effect or survival benefit. Notably, no systemic toxicity was observed in either u-I-FVIOs treatment group. Conclusion This study presents the first theranostic applications of u-I-FVIOs, highlighting their potential as a dual-mode imaging and targeted MHT agent for pancreatic cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chong Wu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: