PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 2, 2025Dental Traumatology7 citationsOpen Access

Performance Comparison of a Domain‐Specific Chatbot and General‐Purpose Chatbots in Dental Traumatology

View Full Paper
VKVipin KumarSSSidhartha SharmaALAjay Logani

Key Points

  • Dental Trauma Evo achieved 85.43% accuracy, surpassing other chatbots in dental traumatology.
  • Significant variance in responses for different question types was noted among the chatbots.
  • Assessment included 45 validated questions across four chatbots over nine days in incognito mode.
  • The findings point to the need for further enhancements and clinical validation of the AI chatbot.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Use of artificial intelligence chatbots in dental traumatology has increased. However, concerns regarding their reliability are yet to be addressed. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a new AI chatbot Dental Trauma Evo in responding to queries on dental fractures and luxations. Materials and Methods A total of 45 questions, including multiple‐choice questions (MCQs), true/false, and yes/no types of questions were created and validated in accordance with the International Association of Dental Traumatology's position statement on fractures and luxations. Over the course of nine consecutive days in incognito mode, they were simultaneously exposed to four chatbots: ChatGPT‐4o, DeepSeek R1, Google Gemini 2.5, and Dental Trauma Evo. The obtained answers were verified for accuracy and consistency. The Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results The best overall accuracy was shown by Dental Trauma Evo (85.43%), which was followed by Google Gemini (81.72%), DeepSeek (80.24%), and ChatGPT‐4o (79.75%). Regarding question type, ChatGPT‐4o, Google Gemini, and Dental Trauma Evo recorded the best responses to Yes/No, True/False, and MCQs respectively. There was an insignificant difference between the question type and the different chatbots ( p > 0.05). Conclusion The Dental Trauma Evo chatbot developed using the International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines exhibited a favorable preliminary performance in the current study. Further research, clinical validation, and model enhancements are necessary to ensure the effective implementation of the same in practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692e3d796c9b3ab28c18707dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/edt.70039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper