PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 2, 2025Scientific Reports7 citationsOpen Access

Development and influencing factors of artificial intelligence literacy and computational thinking in Chinese university students

View Full Paper
ZHZhihua Hu

Key Points

  • AI literacy shows a positive correlation with computational thinking among students, albeit with small effect sizes.
  • Statistical analyses highlighted significant associations using methods like t-test and ANOVA in a large participant pool.
  • Questionnaire survey assessed factors like subject background and AI tool usage in student populations.
  • Findings emphasize the need for tailored educational strategies in higher education to enhance both literacies.

Abstract

This study investigates the developmental status and influencing factors of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and computational thinking (CT) literacy among undergraduates in China's "four new" majors. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model, Social Cognitive Theory, and Constructivist Learning Theory, the research employs a questionnaire survey to assess student's AI and CT literacy, as well as the impact of subject background and AI tool usage. Statistical analyses (t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation) revealed statistically significant positive associations between dimensions of AI literacy and CT; however, effect sizes were uniformly small (|r| < .10), indicating that these associations-while detectable in a large sample-have limited practical magnitude and should be interpreted with caution. Intelligent Thinking exhibited the comparatively strongest association with critical thinking, though the magnitude warrants cautious interpretation. Disciplinary differences are evident: new engineering students excel at algorithmic thinking, while new liberal arts students show strengths in human-machine collaboration. Moreover, group mean differences were observed across usage-frequency categories; however, we did not fit non-linear models, and further research is needed to verify any non-linear patterns. These findings are consistent with the co-development of AIL and CT and may inform the design of discipline-specific, differentiated educational strategies in higher education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhihua Hu (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692e3d796c9b3ab28c18728dhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26888-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Learner Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Pedagogical Agents in Language Learning Videos: Embodiment Effects on Technology Acceptance2024 · 74 citations
  2. 2Computational thinking2006 · 7,342 citations
  3. 3Understanding the Continuance Intention of College Students toward New E-Learning Spaces Based on an Integrated Model of the TAM and TTF2023 · 108 citations
  4. 4Genetic Epistemology1970 · 1,095 citations
  5. 5Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review2021 · 430 citations