Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis shows no correlation of biomarkers with outcome in acute ischemic stroke post endovascular treatment, suggesting NIHSS as a key predictor.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationships between serum S100 calcium binding protein, neuron-specific enolase, matrix metalloproteinase-9, interleukin-6, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR2 biomarkers and futile recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were successfully recanalized with endovascular treatment. Patients and methods: In this study, 44 patients (25 males, 19 females; mean age: 62.2±14.1 years; range, 26 to 81 years) with acute ischemic stroke due to acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion were prospectively analyzed between May 15, 2020 and October 15, 2020. Blood samples were taken at admission, as well as 6 and 24 h after endovascular treatment. A modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used on the 90 th day to identify futile reperfusion. Patients with mRS scores ≤2 were included in the favorable reperfusion group (n=20), while patients with mRS scores ≥3 were considered to exhibit futile reperfusion (n=24). Results: There were no significant differences between the biomarker levels of the groups (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between biomarkers and 90-day mRS scores (p>0.05). Higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (p=0.004), higher number of retriever passes (p=0.032), and higher diastolic blood pressure (p=0.037) were associated with futile recanalization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a higher NIHSS score at admission was an independent predictor of futile recanalization (odds ratio=1.216, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.46, p=0.038). Conclusion: A higher NIHSS score at admission was an independent predictor for futile recanalization. However, we concluded that biomarker levels were not associated with futile recanalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eşref Akıl (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: