BACKGROUND: E-health is the integration of information and communication technology into healthcare, and it has become essential in this digital age, particularly for medical professionals. However, its effective use hinges on e-health literacy, that is, the ability to access, understand, and apply digital health information. This study aimed to determine the independent predictors of e-health literacy among medical students of a medical college in Tamil Nadu, South India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2024 to July 2024 among medical students attending a medical college in Tamil Nadu, South India. A pre-tested, structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. E-health literacy scale (e-HEALS) was used to assess e-health literacy among the students. The responses were scored, and the total score ranged from 8 to 40. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel, numerically coded, and analyzed using IBM SPSS v26. Descriptive analysis was conducted to characterize the study participants and was expressed in frequencies, percentages, and mean (±standard deviation). Independent samples t -test and one-way ANOVA were used to determine the significant difference between the mean e-HEALS score and the independent variables. A multivariable linear regression model was used to determine the independent predictors of the e-HEALS score. A P value 40 hours of internet usage per week ( B = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.36–2.38). The independent predictor that had a negative impact on e-HEALS scores was only one online health resource utilized ( B = −1.30; 95% CI: −2.43 to 0.17). CONCLUSION: Medical schools must prioritize cultivating e-health literacy to equip future healthcare professionals with evidence-based knowledge. Factors such as family income, internet access, and online health resource use seem to impact e-health literacy. A better understanding of these factors can improve the national medical education system.
R. Venkatesan (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: