Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis shows virtual characters improve learning and motivation in K–12 students, suggesting effective educational tools.
Pedagogical agents, conversational agents, motivational agents, and other virtual characters have long been used in educational technologies. We built and analyzed the most comprehensive dataset to date of studies examining how virtual characters influence K–12 students’ learning and learning-related outcomes using three-level meta-analytic procedures. The results from five three-level meta-analyses indicate that virtual characters helped K–12 students learn (g = 0.42, p < .001, k = 70) and improved their motivation ( g = 0.48, p = .001, k = 47) but did not have any significant effects on emotions ( g = 0.60, p = .20, k = 15), perceptions (g = 0.05, p = .88, k = 34), or cognitive load ( g = −0.09, p = .84, k = 5) compared to systems without a virtual character present. We conclude that virtual characters can provide a meaningful addition to learning environments for K–12 learners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaldi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: