Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis uncovered the optimal start-extraction time for coalbed methane, indicating improved gas production and reduced energy use.
Optimizing the start-extraction time for coalbed methane (CBM) wells in mining areas remains challenging. This is due to the limited understanding of mining-induced mechanical changes and fluid migration in protected seams, which restricts the development of clean fossil energy. To address this, a geological-engineering model is constructed to investigate the mining-induced zonal evolution of stress, strain, permeability, and gas migration in protected seams, with the goal of optimizing the start-extraction time. The results show that gas production is controlled by the mechanical properties and gas pressure of protected seams near the well. Initially, these seams experience prolonged elastic strain. Plastic compressive strain develops at close-distance protected seams only when the coalface advances to within 5 m of them. Subsequently, rapid stress relief and complex stress directions lead to continuous plastic shear and expansion strains. As the distance from the mining seam increases, the plastic strains delay and diminish, reverting to elastic strain. These transitions collectively characterize the dynamic development of five distinct permeability regimes. Within permeability-reduced zones, an enhanced gas pressure gradient mitigates production declines. As the start-extraction time is progressively delayed, post-initiation gas production manifests in four phases: gradual decline, slow rebound, rapid increase, and surge. The optimal start-extraction time aligns with the rapid increase phase, when the coalface reaches the well, shortening extraction by at least 5.75 days and reducing electricity consumption by more than 2.07 × 104 kWh in the study area. This research provides practical solutions for methane emission reduction and sustainable CBM development in mining areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ang Xu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: