PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025PLoS ONE1 citationsOpen Access

The quantile time–frequency connectedness of economic policy uncertainty between China and the G7 countries

View Full Paper
JZJizhi ZhaoChongqing UniversityGCGuangfu ChenWuyi University

Key Points

  • Economic policy uncertainty exhibits heterogeneous dynamics, highlighting short-term effects predominately.
  • The quantile-vector autoregressive model effectively captures connectedness metrics in time and frequency domains.
  • Connectedness metrics suggest China predominantly receives shocks from the United States, contrasting with its role as a net transmitter.
  • Analysis emphasizes the importance of extreme conditions in altering connectedness patterns.

Abstract

Most of the existing studies on the connectedness among economic policy uncertainties (EPUs) usually neglect the quantile and frequency domain perspectives. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a quantile time–frequency connectedness model to analyze the connectedness among EPUs by combining the quantile and frequency domain dimensions. First, the quantile-vector autoregressive model (QVAR(p)) is estimated and converted into the quantile-vector moving average representation (QVMA( ∞ )). Next, the generalized prediction error variance decomposition (GFEVD) is computed, from which various types of time-domain connectedness metrics are calculated. Finally, the spectral decomposition method is used to compute frequency-domain connectedness metrics and establish a link between time- and frequency-domain metrics. The empirical results of this paper, based on the sample data of China and G7 countries, reveal several important findings. The EPU of the United States acts as a net transmitter of shocks in both the short and long term, whereas China functions as a net receiver of shocks. The total connectedness index (TCI) demonstrates significant heterogeneity, with its dynamics primarily driven by short-term rather than long-term components. Additionally, connectedness shows substantial improvement under extreme conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930e8b6ea1aef094cca30b6https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337444
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Connectedness of Economic Policy Uncertainty between the G-7 Countries2026
  2. 2Quantile-Time-Frequency Connectedness in Global Equity Markets: Evidence from BRICS and G7 Economies2025
  3. 3Mapping China’s triple interlinkage: a quantile connectedness analysis of agricultural, energy, and policy shocks2025
  4. 4Dynamic Connectedness Among Key Financial Markets and the Role of Policy Uncertainty: A Quantile-Based Approach2025
  5. 5Dynamic Connectedness Among Key Financial Markets and the Role of Policy Uncertainty: A Quantile-Based Approach2025