Observational analysis revealed altered pharmacokinetics of dabigatran during cardiopulmonary bypass, indicating changes in coagulation factors due to idarucizumab administration.
Background The effect of the anticoagulant, dabigatran, and its antagonist, idarucizumab, on coagulation remains poorly quantified. There are few pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data available to describe the interaction in humans or animals undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods Six sheep were given intravenous dabigatran infusion while undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood samples were collected for thromboelastographic reaction time (R-time) and drug assay at 1. 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after starting dabigatran. Further reaction times were measured at 1 min, 5 min, 15 min, 60 min, 4 h and 24 h after initiation of idarucizumab infusion. Plasma dabigatran concentrations, the dabigatran- idarucizumab interaction and R-times were analyzed using an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model with non-linear mixed effects. Results A 2-compartment model described dabigatran pharmacokinetics with a clearance (CL 0.0509 L/min/70 kg), intercompartment clearance (Q 0.229 L/min/70 kg), central volume of distribution (V1 3.89 L/70 kg), peripheral volume of distribution (V2 11.4 L/70 kg). The peripheral volume was 2.25 times larger during bypass. The effect compartment model estimates for an E MAX model using reaction time had an effect site concentration (Ce 50 40.8 mg/L) eliciting half of the maximal effect (E MAX 180 min). A potency factor for the antagonist, idarucizumab (EA 50 29.9 mg/L), moved the dabigatran response relationship to the left. Conclusions Dabigatran reversibly binds to the active site on the thrombin molecule, preventing activation of coagulation factors. Expansion of peripheral volume of distribution of dabigatran was observed during cardiopulmonary bypass, contributing to observed concentrations lower than predicted. A competitive interaction model adequately described dabigatran reversal by idarucizumab. These data and consequent parameter estimates inform future clinical studies in both animals and humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eaton et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: