Controlled experiments show dynamic undercooling influences crystal shape, suggesting insights into crystallization processes.
Magmas contain crystals exhibiting diverse shapes and sizes, yet the relationship between crystal shape (specifically aspect ratio) and undercooling ( Δ T ), the driving force for crystallization, remains poorly constrained. Crystal shape should correlate with undercooling because undercooling governs the growth regime (interface-controlled versus diffusion-controlled) and thus the resulting crystal form. Prior experiments confirm that large nominal undercoolings drive transitions from polyhedral to hopper, skeletal, or dendritic forms. Large undercoolings reflect rapid decompression or cooling, differing from slower cooling rates typical of magmatic intrusions and storage systems. In such slowly cooled environments, crystals remain polyhedral, exhibiting subtle shape variations. Accurately quantifying crystal shape evolution at relatively low undercoolings could provide critical insights into crystallization histories, improving interpretations of the timescales and processes governing magma storage and eruption dynamics. Experimental verification of correlations between aspect ratios of polyhedral crystals and cooling rates remains inconclusive, possibly because nominal undercooling neglects the dynamic evolution of undercooling throughout crystallization. To address this, we introduce average instantaneous undercooling ( Δ TI ), a metric capturing dynamic undercooling history during crystallization. Through controlled cooling experiments and numerical modelling, we demonstrate that higher Δ TI histories produce tabular, high aspect ratio plagioclase crystals, whereas lower Δ TI produces more prismatic crystals with lower aspect ratios. These variations in shape reflect undercooling-driven shifts in the predominant growth mechanism operating on different crystal faces. By quantitatively linking crystal shape to Δ TI , our study provides a new approach for reconstructing crystallization histories in magmas under varying pH2O-T-t conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangler et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: