Microarray analysis reveals distinct gene expression signatures in malignant mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma in rats, indicating unique pathways and carcinogenic potential.
Although numerous experimental studies have demonstrated the carcinogenic potential of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in lungs, the underlying molecular mechanisms—especially gene expression changes associated with different tumor types—remain poorly characterized. To elucidate the molecular signatures associated with MWCNT-induced carcinogenesis, we performed microarray-based gene expression profiling of rat lung tumors induced by MWCNT-7, including both adenocarcinoma (ADC) and malignant mesothelioma (MM), as well as ADCs induced by two types of double-walled CNTs (DWCNTs) differing in fiber length (1.5 µm and 7 µm). Hierarchical clustering revealed that the MWCNT-7-induced MM exhibited a gene expression profile distinct from the ADCs. The ADCs induced by the DWCNTs and the ADC induced by MWCNT-7 shared several pathways that were distinct from those of the MWCNT-7 induced MM. The distinct pathways upregulated in the ADCs versus the MM support the conclusion that MWCNT-induced ADCs arise through distinct biological mechanisms compared to MWCNT-induced MMs and identified tumor-type-specific biomarker candidates: complement factor I (CFI) and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) for ADCs, and fibronectin 1 (FN1) for MM. In addition, the gene expression profiles of the ADCs induced by the three fiber types indicate that both types of thin flexible DWCNTs used in the present study promoted a number of carcinogenic pathways in the rat lung that were also promoted by MWCNT-7, which is a class 2B carcinogen. These results support the conclusion that DWCNTs are carcinogenic in the rat lung and highlight the importance of further assessments of the potential lung carcinogenicity of inhaled thin flexible CNTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: